Les clusters de baleines Bitcoin identifient le niveau de support clé pour que le rallye se poursuive

Les grappes de baleines Bitcoin affichent 23409 $ comme zone de support clé, ce qui signifie que le rallye en cours a un plancher solide.

Les clusters de baleines Bitcoin ( BTC ) montrent que le niveau de 23409 $ est devenu un domaine d’intérêt pour les grands commerçants

Cela indique que la course de taureaux en cours est soutenue par les baleines qui continuent d’accumuler au-dessus de 23 000 $.

Des grappes de baleines se forment lorsque les baleines achètent du Bitcoin et ne transfèrent pas leurs avoirs en BTC du prix d’achat. Les clusters sont utiles pour déterminer les niveaux de support de Bitcoin, en particulier lorsque le marché évolue rapidement.

„Ne devrait pas descendre à moins de 23 409 $“

Selon les analystes de Whalemap, une société d’analyse de données qui suit l’activité des baleines Bitcoin, BTC a formé un plancher solide dans la fourchette de 23000 $ à 23500 $. Ils ont dit :

«Des quantités étonnamment importantes de pertes coulaient sur la chaîne à des prix de 19k. Lorsque cela se produit dans des conditions haussières, BTC nous donne de beaux rallyes (10k -> 20k la dernière fois). Nous avons également plusieurs supports solides à des prix récents … Ne devrait pas descendre en dessous de 23 409 $. “

Il est important pour Bitcoin d’établir des zones de support solides lors d’une course haussière en raison du risque de corrections soudaines. Si les grappes de baleines sont présentes à des niveaux de prix élevés, comme 23409 $, les baleines sont susceptibles de faire une offre légèrement plus élevée et de maintenir l’élan de Bitcoin.

Peter Brandt, un trader de longue date, a identifié la ligne parabolique de Bitcoin datant d’octobre comme un domaine clé à surveiller.

Does Coinbase have a serious unresolved bug?

Does Coinbase have a serious unresolved bug?

We have been notified of a possible bug on Coinbase.

This is a small problem, but for users it can have big consequences, so it cannot be ignored.

What we are about to tell you is in fact a true story that happened to one of our readers who wanted to tell it to inform other users of the platform of the existence of this problem.

Everything comes from an attempt to deposit USDC with QR code.

USDCs are ERC-20 tokens by The News Spy on the Ethereum blockchain, which can be sent to a public Ethereum address.

These public addresses can receive not only ETH tokens, but also any other ERC-20 token.

However, for internal reasons, many exchanges do not allow any ERC-20 token to be received on the ETH address of the user’s wallet on their platform, but require users to use a different Ethereum address for each ERC-20 token they wish to deposit on the exchange wallet.

Since many exchanges work this way, although it often creates problems, there would be nothing wrong with it. That is, this would not be a bug, but just a choice of exchange that can cause some problems anyway.

In fact, if you send an ERC-20 token to the ETH address of your wallet on an exchange, the transaction is successful and cannot be reversed in any way, but the exchange may not recognise it, precisely because many exchanges require that a different address be used for each token.

So for example, you should not send USDC to your Coinbase ETH address, but use the USDC address, which is different.

However, if you choose to scan the QR code of your USDC address there is a problem.
Here is what happened to our reader.

The reader wanted to deposit USDC on his Coinbase wallet

He clicked on „receive“, and selected USDC. Coinbase showed the following screen:

This is an Ethereum address to which you can theoretically also send ETH or other ERC-20 tokens, but if you send tokens that are not USDCs to this address, Coinbase will not recognise them, and they would be lost forever.

The problem is, when scanning the QR code, what the scanner reads is:

That is, the text string encoded in the QR code not only contains the public address to which the USDCs should be sent, but also another one.

Unfortunately, when scanning with some wallets, they take as their sending address not the correct one, i.e. the second one, but the first one, 0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2and9eb0ce3606eb48.

As is easy to understand by comparing them, the two addresses are different, so if the wallet sends the USDCs to the first public address in the QR code it will not send them to Coinbase’s USDC wallet, but to another address.

Unfortunately, the USDC tokens sent in this way have been lost.

XRP price slump of 20% just the beginning of a major market correction?

On December 10th, in an XRP course analysis , we already raised the question of whether Ripple’s native cryptocurrency might be facing a trend reversal. This possibility was primarily justified by the bearish breakout from a larger symmetrical triangle . Since then, the XRP price has plummeted another 15.6% and is currently trading at 47.6 dollar cents.

Now the third largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization has lost further support in the form of the 200 MA line ( red ) on the 4H chart, which speaks for further downside potential, at least in the short term.

It is also very easy to see that the 50 MA line turned into a resistance a good 10 days ago and is increasingly pushing the price of XRP down.

Next levels of support for the XRP course

In the following figure, we have projected two support lines for the Bitcoin Supersplit price on a weekly basis on the daily chart in order to represent the next available support levels that lie between the current price and the minimum price target of just under $ 0.30, which results from the chart formation. Of course, this minimum price target must not be taken at face value. From a statistical point of view, a trend reversal is achieved in only 57-62 percent of the cases. However, this means that the probability is slightly higher that it will be achieved than that it will not be achieved.

I have drawn the next two support lines on the weekly chart as horizontal, green lines in the illustration above

These are 46.9 and 44.3 US cents. The former has obviously slowed the current price collapse for the time being. The next support thereafter is the 50 MA line based on the daily chart ( blue ).

So we see that the XRP course can still rely on some levels of support. The big question at this point is whether the sale of the XRP tokens is primarily due to the Spark token Airdrop and this is a normal correction or Ripple’s native cryptocurrency is the canary for the entire market.

Este sentimento-chave do mercado indica isso sobre a trajetória da Bitcoin

Se alguém escolhesse uma palavra para definir Bitcoin e seu movimento de preços nas últimas semanas, ela seria Persistência.

Com a valorização da moeda criptográfica não mostrando sinais de parada desde outubro, a Bitcoin Profit insinuou uma inversão de preço após ter caído para $15.800 em 14 de novembro. Enquanto o preço do criptograma estava de volta a $16.390 na hora da imprensa, a BTC deveria estar esperando mais correções para o futuro. De fato, segundo a Skew, o sentimento de baixa já começou a tomar forma nos gráficos ao longo de uma semana de negociações de Futuros.

A taxa de financiamento do Bitcoin caiu

Como pode ser observado no gráfico anexo, a taxa de financiamento do Bitcoin Perpetual Swap nas trocas coletivas sofreu uma queda maciça depois que o Bitcoin chegou a $16.480. Uma taxa de financiamento é determinada pelo número de pessoas que esperam que o mercado suba e caia. Quando a taxa de financiamento diminui, isso significa que mais pessoas estão diminuindo o mercado, em comparação com a saudade. Embora tal mudança de ritmo possa ser considerada regular, é essencial observar que ela foi exibida logo após o preço ter atingido uma nova alta para 2020.

O que isto significa é que o mercado está lentamente começando a responder pelo tão esperado período de recuperação. Os comerciantes estão ficando um pouco nervosos com a ascensão do Bitcoin desde que o crypto-asset não tem visto uma reviravolta de alta tão prolongada desde 2019.

Embora seja certamente possível que a Bitcoin possa atingir uma nova alta antes de registrar uma queda, os sinais apontam claramente para uma queda inevitável.

O Open Interest da CME retorna à faixa ATH

Com o comércio de futuros nas bolsas de varejo dando um pequeno mergulho, a CME Bitcoin OI observou um retorno a uma faixa sempre alta. O Open Interest subiu para uma alta de $928 milhões, bem perto do final da semana de negociações em 13 de novembro. Instituições e indivíduos com alto patrimônio líquido têm estado ativos no espaço ao longo da escalada de preços. Será interessante ver se o OI continua a subir durante a semana.

Embora as instituições tenham sido um dos fatores positivos para a Bitcoin em 2020, seu impacto não levou o preço para frente durante uma recuperação. O atual movimento de preços pode estar provando que essa afirmação está errada no momento. O fim institucional da Bitcoin pode se acostumar a absorver liquidez quando o varejo está enfrentando uma venda.

MicroStrategy raised its offer to issue bonds to $550 million.

MicroStrategy Inc., a provider of analytical software, has announced a new goal to raise funding for bitcoin investments. Instead of the $400 million previously announced, the company expects to raise $550 million.

MicroStrategy will offer convertible „senior“ notes without collateral at 0.75% to accredited investors. Interest is expected to be paid every six months starting from 2021.

The maturity date is 15 December 2025, if the company does not repurchase or converts the notes earlier. MicroStrategy expects to receive $537.2 million after deducting costs for investments in bitcoin in accordance with its reserve asset allocation policy.

On 5 December, Michael Saylor, head of MicroStrategy, announced the third digital gold investment. Following the acquisition of 21,454 BTCs (~$250 million at the exchange rate at the time of the transaction) in August and 16,796 BTCs worth $175 million in September, the company acquired an additional 2,574 BTCs worth $50 million.

As a reminder, due to the plans to issue convertible bonds, Citi analysts have lowered recommendations on shares of MicroStrategy Inc., after which their price went down sharply.

Armstrong slår sig om rygter, mens Coinbase venter på NYT Hitpiece

Brian Armstrong, Coinbases administrerende direktør og medstifter, har taget mikrofonen for at fortælle os alt om noget rygte, han hørte i sidste uge, om at den afgående finansminister Steven Mnuchin (som andre rygter siger hader bitcoin og stod bag det Trump-bitcoin-tweet) „planlægger at skynde sig med nogle nye regler vedrørende selvhostede kryptobøger inden udløbet af hans periode. ”

„Denne foreslåede regulering ville, tror vi, kræve, at finansielle institutioner som Coinbase verificerer modtageren / ejeren af ​​den selvhostede tegnebog, indsamler identificerende oplysninger om denne part, før en tilbagetrækning kunne sendes til den selvhostede tegnebog,“ siger Armstrong .

Så dybest set vil de have KYC på den adresse, du trækker dig tilbage til, med et simpelt svar på det, at det er din adresse, for hvordan i alverden ville de vide noget andet.

Da du allerede er Coinbase-kunde, er du allerede KYC-ed, så det er det. De kunne dog bede dig om at underskrive adressen, men du er ikke en kodningsguide, så underskrivelse af adresser er alt sammen kinesisk woodoo for dig, hvilket betyder, at de ikke kan bede om det.

Eller hvis de kan, så alt dette ville gøre er at begrænse overførsler fra Coinbase til din egen tegnebog. Så kan du gøre hvad du vil.

Næppe noget, der giver mening, eller da dette er rygter om Mnuchin, selvom der forventes vrøvl, så lyder det ikke som om det betyder noget, fordi Coinbase slags gør alt dette allerede og spørger dig, hvem der er modtageren af ​​tilbagetrækningen.

Det betyder, at dette rygte, selvom det er sandt, hæves til noget, når det måske ikke lyder som noget at distrahere fra en kommende historie om Coinbase.

New York Times vil tilsyneladende tømme Coinbase formodentlig fordi virksomheden ønsker at forblive upolitisk.

NYT tager tilsyneladende neutralitet til at betyde valg af sider, og derfor planlægger de tilsyneladende at beskylde Coinbase for diskrimination.

„Historien vil sandsynligvis antyde, at sorte medarbejdere blev diskrimineret … dette er falsk,“ siger Coinbase.

Der er nogle fremtrædende bitcoinere, der tilfældigvis er sorte. Arthur Hays er den mest kendte af dem, og han er tilfældigvis også milliardær.

Bitcoin selv ved selvfølgelig ikke, om du er et menneske eller et køleskab, endsige om du er sort eller hvid, men New York Time ved, at det kan presse virksomheder til dydssignalering, fordi de ellers vil blive beskyldt for racisme .

Ikke at distrahere sig selv med, hvad der ikke er deres kerneforretning, er ikke racisme. Det er heller ikke det at stå op for politisering af produkter.

Google er et godt eksempel, med det kaldes nu mere og mere gulag. Twitter og dets propagandakuraterede tendenser er et andet eksempel.

Når folk går for at købe bitcoin, ønsker de ikke at høre Coinbases mening om dagens politiske spørgsmål. Google eller Twitter bør heller ikke skære alles ansigt i øjnene med deres uendelige meninger om uendelige sager, for det er propaganda og propaganda er farligt.

Så både Mnuchin og NYT kan tage deres dinosaurposer og komme af vores platforme med deres trætte diktater til fremtiden for den kommende tidsalder.